#Hospital ratings are confusing because organizations use different criteria to draw conclusions. bit.ly/2kMRpBs via @MedStarWHC
Click to Tweet
It’s also important to look at the time period from which a rating system is getting its data. Some use information from two to three years ago. That’s a long time in terms of policies and procedures in large academic medical centers like ours across the country. You may be looking at data that don’t reflect the hospital’s current operations.
We constantly work to improve how our hospitals provide care. One great example of this is from 2014, when our internal records showed that the orthopedic surgeons’ patients at MedStar Union Memorial Hospital in Baltimore had no infections after 1,600 knee-replacement surgeries in the prior two years. That’s the best rate in the state of Maryland and one of the best in the country. So my team studied what the doctors and their teams were doing and applied that standard of care to all the hospitals throughout the MedStar Health system. We also share our findings with other hospital systems, and we apply what we learn from them to improve our care.
What hospitals are being compared?
It’s also important to consider that comparing the ratings of all hospitals within a certain geographical area may not be giving you the full story of how well those hospitals take care of their patients. It’s really hard to do an apples-to-apples comparison of smaller community hospitals to larger academic medical centers because of the different types of care they provide.
Smaller hospitals may not be equipped to care for some complex medical problems such as strokes, which have a high risk of negative patient outcomes or even death. More complex cases often involve higher numbers of hospital readmissions, which can influence the scores of the larger centers that are equipped to care for these conditions despite their patients receiving the best care.
Related reading: The need for fast stroke care–and why some patients don’t get it
Another potential source of confusion about hospitals’ rankings is that many of the metrics the ranking systems use are based on financial and claims information, rather than true healthcare outcomes. There have been many instances in which a hospital system, having changed nothing about its medical care, improves its rankings significantly just by getting new claims coding and documentation software. That doesn’t mean it’s now a great hospital—that means it always was. The staff members simply didn’t have the tools needed to show it before, and some smaller hospitals may not be able to afford such tools.
How do you know what to compare?
So do data and rankings mean nothing? Should you just pick the closest hospital from Google Maps and hope for the best? Certainly not. Good healthcare data help people become better healthcare consumers. But finding this information is just the first step for an informed healthcare consumer.